Jk Rowling Will Never Harry Potter Again
It's easy to forget that the upcoming Harry Potter Game is, in fact, a video game. Hogwarts Legacy has been a hugely anticipated title ever since information technology was announced two years agone (or even, since it was leaked ii years before that), and it has been so hyped almost entirely off the back of the Harry Potter proper name. Of course, thanks to JK Rowling, the Harry Potter name isn't as clean as information technology used to be.
It has been odd to see 1 side passionately defend a game that they literally had non seen a single 2d of before last dark, defending it entirely on the basis of liking Harry Potter, while simultaneously being surprised that others feel the Potter well is poisoned and begging doubters to judge the game for what it is, even though they already beloved it sight unseen. I've written nigh the questions I've been asked (and the permission I've been asked to grant) every bit a trans person, and take written a disclaimer for the site in gild to inform our readers nigh our coverage. Other sites are boycotting information technology all together. After watching 14 minutes of gameplay, I have to ask - is this what all the fuss was about?
Folks, the game looks pretty meh. Let's leave JK Rowling and all of that toxicity aside for at present, and just wait at the game. Y'all don't recollect it'southward a teeny bit suspicious that in a 14 minute gameplay preview, the longest non-cutscene clip of gameplay we saw was half dozen seconds long? We bounced around anywhere, our eyes never allowed to settle, and I suspect that'due south considering the developers wanted to hide that a lot of it is repetitive. It looks similar enemies simply kind of stand up there while you zap them with your wand, and I doubtable that volition go very sometime very quickly. Warner Bros. previously oversaw the development of the Batman: Arkham games, admittedly past a dissimilar studio, and they reinvented video game combat in a way everyone else riffed off for a decade. 'Stand and point at largely stationary enemies' doesn't experience quite so dynamic.
It'south an open world, but we never become to run into much of it, and despite chucking us effectually to practically every location on offer, only the Room of Requirement and the optional dungeons look interesting. We encounter nil that even resembles a good boss battle, likely because the combat is so deadening, and the lesson portions of the game await to be disjointed affairs that gamify basic functions like pouring potion in ways that will speedily abound boring. The plot, meanwhile, revolves around the anti-Semitic caricatures rebelling, and seems to cast the hero yet again as a Chosen One as Harry Potter struggles with the same issues of Star Wars, in that its impossible for a nobody to exist a somebody. They have to be built-in a special somebody. Considering the stereotyped minorities, gender essentialism, and a Sorting Lid that defines your unabridged life by the person y'all are as an 11-year-erstwhile, it'due south no surprise Harry Potter stories keep to reinforce the idea you tin only exist special if you were built-in special.
Has my brain just been melted when it comes to all things Harry Potter that I cannot guess it fairly? I don't think we can ever truly reply the questions of our own biases. I certainly recall those who have been in love with the game from the IP alone are clearly putting their thumb on the scale when it comes to pre-emptively declaring this a GOTY contender, just and so perhaps I'k looking for the worst in it. I know I would say this, but I don't think I am.
I have no issue with the mobile game-style timers, for case. It's clearly a groundwork mechanic that helps you grow healing potions or other items, and feels a fleck like when you could send ships on missions in Assassin's Creed, send task forces to destroy bases in Mass Effect, or transport companions to gather resources in Genshin Impact. It'southward a fairly easily-off thing that that game puts a real world timer on to terminate ridiculously easy farming.
And so at that place'southward the fact I still have somewhat fond feelings towards Harry Potter equally an entity, I but can't split JK Rowling from that entity. Nosotros could, by the way. If more of you were prepared to speak out against her instead of justifying her actions (or justifying themselves ignoring them), we might be able to force modify. Instead of looking for ways to deflect criticism from JK Rowling in order to make yourself experience better about watching Fantastic Beasts or going to Harry Potter World or playing Hogwarts Legacy, if y'all admitted she was a cretin there could be room for meaningful action. Papa John was forced out of his own business, but y'all can all the same order Papa John's, he just doesn't get the money anymore.
I grew up reading Harry Potter, to the betoken where I would scout the window on the day a new book launched then devour information technology within hours. I've seen every movie. I still, despite all my feelings for JK Rowling, recall of myself equally a Ravenclaw. I love Luna Lovegood more than nearly characters in literature. In that location are three(?!) separate Harry Potter handbags that I think are very fucking cool and accept only resisted buying because of Ms. JKR. I call up Daniel Radcliffe is 1 of the most underrated actors of our generation, but I also think Emma Watson is wildly overrated and then peradventure that balances out. The short version is I still recognise that at that place are some nifty things to take come out of Harry Potter. Aught I've seen has convinced me that Hogwarts Legacy is one of them.
Mostly I'm only exhausted. I can't believe a game that looks this 'okay' has managed to boss conversations for the by 2 years and has people searching their souls for whether being an ally to trans people matters more than or less than this beige sludge. The game might exist good. It might be great! Merely we haven't seen annihilation groovy yet, have we? Is this actually where our standards are right now? Maybe I'd be less harsh on the game if information technology wasn't Harry Potter, merely the residuum of you would be significantly more than harsh, so I guess it all works out in the end.
About The Author
guzmanthearegaven.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.thegamer.com/hogwarts-legacy-harry-potter-jk-rowling-controversy/
0 Response to "Jk Rowling Will Never Harry Potter Again"
Post a Comment